1. Find one or more donors with consistent type 3 stool (dark, small, firm, dry), 0 lifetime antimicrobial use, peak physical and mental health, and other ideal questionnaire answers. Test them in a clinical trial for one or more conditions such as IBS, CFS, IBD. From this we should be able to get some idea of how that quality donor compares with the current quality. In my opinion we should be doing simultaneous oral and rectal FMT administration already, in addition to at least 10 FMTs per person.
I believe my "dark type 3 stools hypothesis" could be verified via bile acid metabolism profiling. As I believe a deficiency in bile acid metabolism (missing microbes) is a primary cause of other stool types [1].
If possible, test different
types of donors in this step, such as "sprinter vs marathon runner". If
we can't do that in this same step, then do that next. See if sprinter
is more effective for certain conditions and marathon runner more
effective for others, or is one generally more effective than the other,
and if mixed is that even better.
2. After that, we can move on to test things like "if the recipients
liquid fast for 1-5 days prior does that increase efficacy" [1]. Could also
test liquid fasting while doing FMTs. The liquid, and length, would
vary depending on what different people could tolerate. Treatment
frequency (daily vs 1x/week), and varying lengths could also be tested
at this point. Possibly test with/without inducing diarrhea beforehand
to clear out the intestines. If someone is insistent on oral capsules
only, then a bile acid sequestrant should be tested along side it. For
me, taking a bile acid sequestrant with oral FMT seemed to increase
effectiveness (but not resistance to perturbation). But I think you can
get the same or better results by using both upper and lower routes.
I'm not sure where placebo-control comes in. I've been waiting 4+ years to get FMT from a high quality donor. I've been close to death so many times due to lack of a high quality donor. There are other people who died due to the lack of a high quality donor. Is it ethical to give us placebo? If I got placebo I could be waiting another 4 years for another opportunity.
EDIT: The way the ASU autism team is doing placebo in 2019 seems like a good way to do it. The placebo group will get FMT after a number of weeks.
My thoughts on transferring unknowns, or susceptibility/probability of later disease development:
The key is to find FMT donors with eubiotic, disease resistant, unperturbed, curative gut microbiomes. You can find these people, and reduce the risk of transferring susceptibility/probability of later disease development via the use of an extensive questionnaire that covers the donor's entire life, family, and family history. Eg: https://humanmicrobiome.info/fmt-questionnaire/
Even though the example given in that link (Myron Rolle) is probably not the perfect donor (it looks like he's balding, which is immune system dysfunction I think), he's still a major improvement for >99% of the population. An acceptable risk:reward ratio can be achieved with sufficient donor quality. But also, he may have picked up a pathogen that triggered the immune system which resulted in balding. So at his current age he would be a lower quality donor, but if you got him at a younger age he wouldn't necessarily transfer balding-potential to an FMT recipient. The same goes for other diseases of old age. The diseases develop as the body deteriorates and pathogens accumulate. So if you can prevent that deterioration (prevent/cure dysbiosis and the resulting immune system dysfunction, via FMT from young healthy donors https://humanmicrobiome.info/aging/) then the disease won't develop, even if it's heritable.
My efforts to try and get this FMT trial done:
Besides emailing the 180 or so researchers doing FMT clinical trials, I also:
Looked through the recent published research on IBS and CFS and wrote to American authors on those papers asking them if they were able to do an FMT clinical trial with high quality donors, or if they had a recommendation for who to contact. I also looked up major microbiome research centers in the US and wrote to them. There are quite a few in my Southern California area. But again they didn't seem interested.Someone advised me to write to American gastroenterology association authors on IBS guidelines, and US authors on the Rome Foundation IBS guidelines, and same for the CFS researchers. So I did write to dozens of those people but none were able & willing to do an FMT clinical trial.
This microbiome webinar I just watched had a great comment from Dr Amy Proal about how lack of access to clinical trials also means they are losing useful data due to people having to resort to DIY.
---
You can use the microbiome forum for discussion. The Blogger commenting system is pretty bad.
Previously posted on /r/fecaltransplant.
See previous posts about FMT donor quality under the "FMT" section here: https://maximiliankohler.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
Any luck finding donors or funding? I would donate some as I am also in need of a good donor.
ReplyDeleteI deleted my old comment which had out of date info. I started up HumanMicrobes.org for this purpose, and have screened over a million donor applicants at this point. The Human Microbiome forum can be used for discussion.
DeleteAs a general comment, you would likely only beed to find 1 “superdonor” as others would be created after treatment with the initial sample. The challenge is finding that initial subject
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately it does not work that way. Not all donor microbes are transferred and colonize. The recipient definitely doesn't turn into an identical copy of the donor.
DeleteHowever, if dry ice shipping proves to be as effective as fresh stool then 1 donor could supply a large amount of recipients.
Thank you I will
ReplyDeleteIs there any proof that using Miralax/colonoscopy prep before FMT is more effective than just using liquid fast diet?
ReplyDeletehow do i sign up to become a donor ?
ReplyDeleteWhat age range is considered "Young" ?
ReplyDeleteNot too sure, but 30 years old is a current rough estimate.
DeleteIf very few antibiotics are used, does this jeopardize the condition of the stool? What if all other conditions are ideal?
ReplyDeleteIt's not known exactly how important it is (and it probably varies), but antibiotics do permanent damage https://humanmicrobiome.info/antibiotics/. But even if you find someone with zero antibiotic use that doesn't mean they have a good gut microbiome, since much of the gut microbiome is inherited from the parents.
DeleteI'm a PhD in applied stats that focused on public health. There are a few unknowns in your road map proposal that I could help you fill in, if interested.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely! Feel free to reach out via the microbiome forum or humanmicrobes.org .
DeleteMaximilian Kohler, I appreciate and commend your commitment to this project. I'm reaching out regarding an inquiry about topical antimicrobials on the suitability for the FMT donors. Specifically pertaining to the use of topical agents such as Neosporin in comparison to oral antibiotics. Given that topical antimicrobials are generally considered less detrimental to the gut microbiome than systemic oral antibiotics, I am curious about the implications of their occasional use in the context of FMT donor eligibility. For instance, would a potential donor who has applied Neosporin or a similar antimicrobial on fewer than five occasions in their lifetime (not in the last year), without any other antimicrobial applications still be considered eligible for donation? I understand this is a nuanced area and appreciate any insights you can provide based on your expertise and current research findings in the field. Thank you for your time and consideration.
ReplyDeleteThe microbiome forum is the correct place for questions and discussions of that nature. You can review the microbiome wiki too.
Delete